The Department of Transportation (DOTr) has announced plans to allow
unconsolidated jeepney drivers and operators to return to their original
routes, despite the expiration of the mandatory Public Utility Vehicle
(PUV) consolidation deadline.
This decision is framed as an effort to address ongoing opposition to the
Public Transport Modernization Program (PTMP).
Some view the move as a proactive step by the DOTr to respond to the
concerns of unconsolidated jeepney drivers and operators. By allowing them
to return to their previous routes, the DOTr is seen as adopting a more
inclusive approach to the PTMP.
The steps taken by the DOTr in reaching this decision indicate a thoughtful
and comprehensive strategy. It began with consultations involving transport
groups and culminated in the creation of a framework that enables the
limited operation of unconsolidated jeepneys.
However, others have a different perspective. They argue that allowing
unconsolidated jeepneys to return to their previous routes undermines the
core rationale behind the PUV modernization program.
This leniency reinforces the belief among some opponents of modernization
that regulatory compliance is negotiable, potentially jeopardizing the
integrity of future efforts to modernize the mass transport system.
Supporters of the DOTr's move contend that involving key stakeholders
demonstrates a collaborative effort to refine the PUV modernization
program. They commend the establishment of a special committee to assess
the program's progress and anticipate that consulting various stakeholders
will result in recommendations that balance the needs of drivers with the
goals of a modern transport system.
Supporters also find it encouraging that figures like Transportation
Secretary Vince Dizon and Senator Grace Poe have acknowledged the
importance of providing jeepney drivers with opportunities to thrive.
However, the return of unconsolidated-and mostly aging-jeepneys to the
roads could be seen as contradictory to the long-term objectives of
modernization.
There are concerns that addressing the fears of drivers and operators about
losing their livelihoods may lead to token gestures rather than actionable
solutions, further delaying efforts to elevate our public transport system
to global standards.
The focus on the right to earn a decent living, combined with the
aspiration for a safe and dignified transport system, aligns well with the
broader goal of ensuring that public transportation meets the needs of all
commuters.
Looking ahead, it is crucial for the DOTr to ensure the timely development
of route plans that facilitate the return of drivers to their franchises
while improving the commuting experience for the public.
This progress signals the DOTr's commitment to balancing modernization with
the livelihoods of those who are integral to the transport ecosystem.
Ultimately, it is important for all stakeholders to engage in constructive
dialogue as efforts are made to create a transport system that is both
efficient and socially responsible. This collaborative approach will be
essential in shaping a future where public transport meets global standards
while also respecting the livelihoods of dedicated drivers.
It's hard not to think that the DOTr is again backing down to the demands
of drivers and operators of traditional-a.k.a old-jeepneys. But let's give
the DOTr leadership the benefit of the doubt that he wants to strike that
perfect balance between protecting people's livelihood and pushing
modernization.